Lack of Land Management Contributed to Devastating Wildfire
The lack of active land management, including “controlled burning and mowing”, contributed to the severity of last year’s Llantysilio mountain wildfire, according to findings from a recent report.
The 63-page report on the Llantysilio mountain wildfire that ravaged over 290 hectares of uplands for over a month last year gave several recommendations on reducing the risk of wildfires in the future.
The report concluded: “The lack of robust land management over an extended period of time on the mountain contributed towards the length of time the fire burned and the devastation it caused. Therefore, a regular programme of land management activities is crucial if the risk of extensive environmental and economic damage from similar fires is to be lessened in future.”
Within the report Natural Resources Wales cited the neighbouring grouse moor, Ruabon Moor, “as a local example of a moorland which is effectively managed by rotational small patch burning and mowing.”
Denbighshire’s Countryside Services commented on the severity of the wildfire saying, “in places, it would take years to restore as the soil structure and seed stock has been destroyed”, and there was a risk that “further soil would be lost through the effects of wind and water run-off”.
Llantysilio Mountain Fire
The report commissioned by Denbighshire County Council’s Communities Scrutiny Committee is due to be heard at a meeting on 5th September. The report published on 29th August can be found here.
250 hectares of the wildfire was within the 1150 hectare Ruabon/Llantysilio Mountains and Minera Grassland Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), designated such for it’s upland heath and blanket bog communities alongside its assemblage of upland breeding birds including a nationally important breeding population of black grouse and curlew.
Why This Matters
Several groups in the UK want to end the practice of burning moorland. Grouse moor managers burn patches of moorland to create a more desirable habitat for grouse. This practice controls the amount of vegetation in an area that has several benefits. First, the lower vegetation creates less concealment for predators. The reduced concealment means that the predators are less successful in preying on the grouse. Second, when the heather grows back, there are more grass shoots for the grouse to feed on. Also, the insect population is higher in the shorter heather. Studies have shown an increase in the grouse population due to shorter heather.
All of this matters because several groups in the UK want to end grouse shooting. One way to hurt the grouse shooting community is to limit their ability to manage the land and host successful hunts. However, science is on the side of the grouse moor managers and conservation hunters.
Why This Matters segment is the opinion of the editor. Agree or disagree, let us know in the comments below.
The British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) was founded as the Wildfowlers’ Association of Great Britain and Ireland, (WAGBI) in 1908 by Stanley Duncan FZS and Sir Ralph Payne-Gallwey Bt. Stanley Duncan set up WAGBI to help professional wildfowlers, protect wildfowl habitat, and to defend the sport of wildfowling against the growing enthusiasm of extremists bent on total protection of wild birds. In 1981 WAGBI changed its name to the British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC). Today BASC has a membership of 155,000 and growing.